parliamentary spokesman Izquierda Unida, Gaspar Llamazares, the Commission was now Science and Innovation rejection shared by IU and ICV in relation to the Draft Law on Science, Technology and Innovation is now struggling for final approval in the House, since the commission has, in this case, competition full legislative. He argued that rejection, among other issues, because the law "does not resolve but only deepened in the uncertainties of the researchers." Llamazares
shared time with fellow ERC Francesc Canet, given the different scores on the text handle the two components that make up the parliamentary group technical ERC-IU-ICV, as are established from the beginning legislature for similar cases.
Llamazares said that when this bill came into the House "recognized, so we did in the general debate, positive aspects in the text that should help to incorporate technological innovation as a strategic element to our society and business network. "
however, specified that despite some progress achieved, the Law of Science is referred as "very important gap remains, among which highlighted the" failure to ensure continued career research staff nor the stability system does not solve the serious problem of insecurity in the sector, not considering the race for the entire research staff, maintain the duality of the two funding agencies-one for research and one for innovation, or not having a financial report to ensure funding " .
Gaspar Llamazares recalled that "despite the partial amendments to IU and ICV recorded at the time to try to correct these issues, we are only accepted and traded some issues were" minor. " We therefore believe that the bulk of the shortcomings of the bill continues. "
"But even more," he added, " the potential incorporation of some transactions with other groups worse, in our opinion, largely text in certain aspects. In addition, as a result we end up having a very negative assessment of the project.
To detail this approach, Llamazares notes:
· This is a law that does not solve the real problems of our system of science, technology and innovation and in particular will be a law against the workers of the research:
Do not acknowledge the research staff at its three branches (scientific, technical and management staff) but continues in the nineteenth century idea that science is equal to researchers.
Do not recognize the career path for technical staff and management, while it reflected the existing scientific staff. As an important caveat, the scales are removed themselves from the CSIC, that they become part of OPIS and maintained aberrant situation that researchers Headlines IPO, whatever their level, are integrated into the lower level, which is unacceptable .
• The only advantage or 'conquest' is the elimination of grants (the system 2 +2) in contracts of up to four years, but maintain the conditions and the current wage claims. According to the law, first-year contract may be charged against the minimum wage to 1,100 euros today. Most will say, 'why I stay with the scholarship! "
Do not be resolved, but further on the problem of insecurity in the public research sector. If we're at levels 40-45% of precarious contracts, with this law research and technical staff of public sector research may be precarious ad infinitum.
• The new additional provision twenty-third (result of a transaction, among others, Amendment 304 to the CP) implies that all temporary contracts (all of which are regulated in Articles 19.2, 25.7 and 29 of this Act) was not able to apply Articles 15.1 and 15.5 of the Statute of Workers. Removed, therefore the ability to access permanent employment contracts for chaining in the same job, the very popular 'Caldera law. " It is a very curious way of recognizing excellence and the need for change in the production model through R + D + i.
• The access contract still guarantees stability to post required both by the unions as the researchers recruited, and the positive evaluation is only worthwhile for access to places of permanent staff, losing the minimum 'guarantees' that are existing contracts Ramón y Cajal.
· Amendments SIC particular focus on putting research centers and universities to direct service companies. The perverse concept of 'reverse transfer' is what we all understand it is: will the big companies to decide the objectives that should work in the public sector researchers. And be free.
shared time with fellow ERC Francesc Canet, given the different scores on the text handle the two components that make up the parliamentary group technical ERC-IU-ICV, as are established from the beginning legislature for similar cases.
Llamazares said that when this bill came into the House "recognized, so we did in the general debate, positive aspects in the text that should help to incorporate technological innovation as a strategic element to our society and business network. "
however, specified that despite some progress achieved, the Law of Science is referred as "very important gap remains, among which highlighted the" failure to ensure continued career research staff nor the stability system does not solve the serious problem of insecurity in the sector, not considering the race for the entire research staff, maintain the duality of the two funding agencies-one for research and one for innovation, or not having a financial report to ensure funding " .
Gaspar Llamazares recalled that "despite the partial amendments to IU and ICV recorded at the time to try to correct these issues, we are only accepted and traded some issues were" minor. " We therefore believe that the bulk of the shortcomings of the bill continues. "
"But even more," he added, " the potential incorporation of some transactions with other groups worse, in our opinion, largely text in certain aspects. In addition, as a result we end up having a very negative assessment of the project.
To detail this approach, Llamazares notes:
· This is a law that does not solve the real problems of our system of science, technology and innovation and in particular will be a law against the workers of the research:
Do not acknowledge the research staff at its three branches (scientific, technical and management staff) but continues in the nineteenth century idea that science is equal to researchers.
Do not recognize the career path for technical staff and management, while it reflected the existing scientific staff. As an important caveat, the scales are removed themselves from the CSIC, that they become part of OPIS and maintained aberrant situation that researchers Headlines IPO, whatever their level, are integrated into the lower level, which is unacceptable .
• The only advantage or 'conquest' is the elimination of grants (the system 2 +2) in contracts of up to four years, but maintain the conditions and the current wage claims. According to the law, first-year contract may be charged against the minimum wage to 1,100 euros today. Most will say, 'why I stay with the scholarship! "
Do not be resolved, but further on the problem of insecurity in the public research sector. If we're at levels 40-45% of precarious contracts, with this law research and technical staff of public sector research may be precarious ad infinitum.
• The new additional provision twenty-third (result of a transaction, among others, Amendment 304 to the CP) implies that all temporary contracts (all of which are regulated in Articles 19.2, 25.7 and 29 of this Act) was not able to apply Articles 15.1 and 15.5 of the Statute of Workers. Removed, therefore the ability to access permanent employment contracts for chaining in the same job, the very popular 'Caldera law. " It is a very curious way of recognizing excellence and the need for change in the production model through R + D + i.
• The access contract still guarantees stability to post required both by the unions as the researchers recruited, and the positive evaluation is only worthwhile for access to places of permanent staff, losing the minimum 'guarantees' that are existing contracts Ramón y Cajal.
· Amendments SIC particular focus on putting research centers and universities to direct service companies. The perverse concept of 'reverse transfer' is what we all understand it is: will the big companies to decide the objectives that should work in the public sector researchers. And be free.
0 comments:
Post a Comment